PK Rant

[Kasreyn]

Allow me to explain.

First off, the context: At least in the old days, on Bnet, a PKK was a person who killed "PK's" all the time. Obviously there wouldn't be time enough in his day to first be attacked by each of them, then retaliate in self-defense! (there's clearly no problem with fighting in self-defense: more power to you!). So, instead PKK's would attack "PK's" who never attacked them yet.

Wait... hmm... so the question is, How does the PKK *know* his victim is a PK??

Very simple! He doesn't. There's no way of knowing unless the PKK was an eyewitness to the original PK'ing - which is very rare, of course. So if you look at it logically, it's clear that PKK's are merely vigilantes, operating on hearsay evidence. And you expect any sane, right-thinking person to support this?

Most PKK's are interested in the same "kicks" that PK's enjoy. They justify it by claiming - note I say CLAIMING - that they only attack PK's. But who can trust their word, or their judgement? It's a slipperly slope to start down. Best not to even begin.

That's why I say "A PKK is just a PK with an excuse".

-Kasreyn