04-13-2006, 03:33 AM
Why are we beating a dead horse again?
Death Penalty has been brought up numerous times in your recent posts Doc. This exact topic was already mentioned before in this thread.
Now, your title shows that you recognize this ("under fire again"). But what I don't see anything new being said by you, nor do I see any indication of trying to take the topic in a new direction.
I suppose it just boils down to this: why is there a new thread dedicated to this and not just a new post in the old thread?
Cheers,
Munk
PS. I don't mean this post as trying to be some kind of forum moderator. But I do mean this as a genuine question. Where is the new direction? What makes this different than the other thread? When is beating a dead horse enough?
Death Penalty has been brought up numerous times in your recent posts Doc. This exact topic was already mentioned before in this thread.
Now, your title shows that you recognize this ("under fire again"). But what I don't see anything new being said by you, nor do I see any indication of trying to take the topic in a new direction.
I suppose it just boils down to this: why is there a new thread dedicated to this and not just a new post in the old thread?
Cheers,
Munk
PS. I don't mean this post as trying to be some kind of forum moderator. But I do mean this as a genuine question. Where is the new direction? What makes this different than the other thread? When is beating a dead horse enough?