05-14-2003, 03:03 AM
Arggggh you drew me back in.
You just said the flaw with my example was that I say "development is solely time dependent".
GO BACK AND REREAD IT. I specifically used a geometic figure with more than 1 variable. I did that specifically for the reason you mention.
* My entire point was that time(age effects) maturuty but does not have a set correlation - it cannot "mark" maturity as it helps determine maturity*
I am convinced that you are simply argueing to save face now. I mean really it is wrong to say exactly what I didnt say and then fault me for it.
Since you list that as THE reason I was wrong, now that I pointed out your that you "missread" it - I assume you agree?
You just said the flaw with my example was that I say "development is solely time dependent".
GO BACK AND REREAD IT. I specifically used a geometic figure with more than 1 variable. I did that specifically for the reason you mention.
* My entire point was that time(age effects) maturuty but does not have a set correlation - it cannot "mark" maturity as it helps determine maturity*
I am convinced that you are simply argueing to save face now. I mean really it is wrong to say exactly what I didnt say and then fault me for it.
Since you list that as THE reason I was wrong, now that I pointed out your that you "missread" it - I assume you agree?