+- The Lurker Lounge Forums (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Lurker Games (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Diablo III (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: Cinematic Stills - Updated with new Trailer (/thread-13442.html)
Cinematic Stills - Updated with new Trailer - Zarathustra - 10-19-2011
Blizzard has always been known for their cinematics. I still remember the first time I saw that raven...
ANYWAY, how's this for some amazing CG?
![[Image: L9TMX3E3BAEA1318598214829.jpg]](http://eu.media1.battle.net/cms/gallery/L9TMX3E3BAEA1318598214829.jpg)
![[Image: X4OUA7N0MML91318598229409.jpg]](http://eu.media4.battle.net/cms/gallery/X4OUA7N0MML91318598229409.jpg)
She has pores...
RE: Cinematic Stills - LavCat - 10-19-2011
(10-19-2011, 02:49 AM)Zarathustra Wrote: She has pores...
And eyes.
RE: Cinematic Stills - Frag - 10-19-2011
The hair, wow. Looks like I could brush it off of her face.
RE: Cinematic Stills - Zarathustra - 10-19-2011
Speculation time! Just what in hell (used quite literally) are we looking at in the second shot?
RE: Cinematic Stills - NuurAbSaal - 10-19-2011
(10-19-2011, 10:30 PM)Zarathustra Wrote: Speculation time! Just what in hell (used quite literally) are we looking at in the second shot?
Dire wabbit?
take care
Tarabulus
RE: Cinematic Stills - Tal - 10-20-2011
(10-19-2011, 10:30 PM)Zarathustra Wrote: Speculation time! Just what in hell (used quite literally) are we looking at in the second shot?
Diablo.
RE: Cinematic Stills - DeeBye - 10-20-2011
(10-19-2011, 10:30 PM)Zarathustra Wrote: Speculation time! Just what in hell (used quite literally) are we looking at in the second shot?
Shia Labeouf seeing Bumblebee for the first time.
RE: Cinematic Stills - Zarathustra - 10-20-2011
(10-20-2011, 05:15 AM)DeeBye Wrote:(10-19-2011, 10:30 PM)Zarathustra Wrote: Speculation time! Just what in hell (used quite literally) are we looking at in the second shot?
Shia Labeouf seeing Bumblebee for the first time.
Well played.
RE: Cinematic Stills - Roland - 10-20-2011
(10-19-2011, 10:30 PM)Zarathustra Wrote: Speculation time! Just what in hell (used quite literally) are we looking at in the second shot?
I'm surprised no one else picked up on this yet, but I'd say it's a Dune Thresher. The wide mouth and jutting lower jaw are fairly convincing evidence.
And yes, their cinematics - which have always been top-notch - have done nothing but improve. I cannot wait for them to make a full-blown CGI movie. I'd pay to see it in theaters - twice!
RE: Cinematic Stills - NuurAbSaal - 10-20-2011
(10-20-2011, 05:54 PM)Roland Wrote:(10-19-2011, 10:30 PM)Zarathustra Wrote: Speculation time! Just what in hell (used quite literally) are we looking at in the second shot?
I'm surprised no one else picked up on this yet, but I'd say it's a Dune Thresher. The wide mouth and jutting lower jaw are fairly convincing evidence.
One set of eyes too many though. I also think the creature (bunny!) in the photo isn't quite as streamlined as a Dune Thresher. Somehow it looks too big as well, but that is entirely based on the picture of Threshers in my head, so yeah...
take care
Tarabulus
RE: Cinematic Stills - Updated with new Trailer - Zarathustra - 10-21-2011
Turns out, it's Azmodan...
RE: Cinematic Stills - Updated with new Trailer - [wcip]Angel - 10-22-2011
Wohoo! Original Lore! *happy*!
Let's keep those Lesser Evils coming! Belial, you're up next!