12-01-2003, 07:44 PM
WarBlade,Dec 1 2003, 01:50 AM Wrote:My point is not about SP, but about the oddity in calling something an "Enchantress" that is clearly advertised as being simply 'a-Sorceress-who-happens-to-use-Enchant-among-a-collection-of-other-attacks'....but what are you talking about? This build puts 60 skill points into one form of attack. Yea, by the time you get to 99, you can max two more skills for a second attack + mastery. Realistically, however, a build should be complete around level 80-85. Beyond that, getting level ups are just for the sake of getting level ups. So, at this level you'll have 20 more skill points for a secondary attack - big whoop. Or can we not call poison necros with PD, PE, PN poison necros anymore; Leaper barbs with Leap, LA, mastery leaper barbs anymore; Fireball sorcs with FBolt, FBall, mastery fireball sorcs anymore; Hammerdins with whatever-the-hell-hammerdins-max hammerdins anymore...
WarBlade Wrote:I stick to my argument. Suggestions about sets or uniques are in themselves a guide killer IMO.
Exactly. That is why we need an item guide that lists every set item, unique item, runeword, or other good magic items and then mention every build that each specific item is good for, and why.
On second thought, maybe not. Maybe that is why some specific items are listed in repsective guides to let the readers know what sort of modifiers are desirable so they might see that a bow charged with exploding arrow might be worthwhile.