Macro no longer working as intended
#4
The difference is that [noharm][dead] is two different conditionals (where either one causes the target to clear), whereas [noharm,dead] is one (where both have to be present to clear the target). So the single conditional [noharm,dead] only fires if the target is both dead and not an enemy, whereas [noharm][dead] fires if either the target is not an enemy, or if the target is dead.

[noharm] is not enough, as it still tries to fire if the target is dead (assuming it is an enemy).

This is not something that has changed, by the way -- I don't know why the issue only came up recently.
Earthen Ring-EU:
Taelas -- 60 Human Protection Warrior; Shaleen -- 52 Human Retribution Paladin; Raethal -- 51 Worgen Guardian Druid; Szar -- 50 Human Fire Mage; Caethan -- 60 Human Blood Death Knight; Danee -- 41 Human Outlaw Rogue; Ainsleigh -- 52 Dark Iron Dwarf Fury Warrior; Mihena -- 44 Void Elf Affliction Warlock; Chiyan -- 41 Pandaren Brewmaster Monk; Threkk -- 40 Orc Fury Warrior; Alliera -- 41 Night Elf Havoc Demon Hunter;
Darkmoon Faire-EU:
Sieon -- 45 Blood Elf Retribution Paladin; Kuaryo -- 51 Pandaren Brewmaster Monk
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Macro no longer working as intended - by LavCat - 01-14-2012, 07:20 AM
RE: Macro no longer working as intended - by Taelas - 01-24-2012, 10:07 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)