05-10-2003, 02:47 AM
As a member of the LurkerLounge, I don't bring out dueling into the forums. However, now that it's become part of the question, I'd be glad to give out my extensive knowlege on the dueling subject.
Myself, I don't consider Lightning as dishonorable. Personaly, I find it humorous. Assuming you have two warriors hand at hand, you must have about 10% more cth than the opponents ac to hit him nearly 100% of the time. So, if you have a lightning/hase sword, you'd have to pack on the gold/perfs like crazy only to hit someone. Meaning you'd have pathetic dmg, mana, and life; giving the other guy a huge advantage. Furthermore, if you enjoy that dreded (personal opinion, I didn't care for sparky) sparkling mail, then you will have such low ac, the other guy or myself, will have huge damage, mana, and life for against you. Also, if you like schafers hammer, well don't, the 50 lightning dmg is nice, but it lacks speed for within a duel.
Myself, I don't consider Lightning as dishonorable. Personaly, I find it humorous. Assuming you have two warriors hand at hand, you must have about 10% more cth than the opponents ac to hit him nearly 100% of the time. So, if you have a lightning/hase sword, you'd have to pack on the gold/perfs like crazy only to hit someone. Meaning you'd have pathetic dmg, mana, and life; giving the other guy a huge advantage. Furthermore, if you enjoy that dreded (personal opinion, I didn't care for sparky) sparkling mail, then you will have such low ac, the other guy or myself, will have huge damage, mana, and life for against you. Also, if you like schafers hammer, well don't, the 50 lightning dmg is nice, but it lacks speed for within a duel.