01-13-2006, 06:28 PM
kandrathe,Jan 13 2006, 07:20 PM Wrote:IF it had been written that the "House and Senate passed the law, and the President signed it", then I would have no issues. The way it was written indicated to me a bias of the author.
[right][snapback]99331[/snapback][/right]
Perhaps, guess we have different point of view (until rogue clarifies at least). I don't particularly feel that the first part is necessary if you're being brief, since laws become so the second the president signs it.
On a sidenote, and tacking a bit on these ammends:
Quote:Imagine the political fallout if this bill was vetoed.
Do you think it'd fall only on the prez for vetoing it? After all, if he is the one who raises a big enough stink over the ammends that are being tacked to the original bill, wouldn't it be possible for the fallout to drop over the House and/or Senate?
Or is it too late for any president to do so?