01-09-2006, 06:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2006, 06:15 PM by Occhidiangela.)
jahcs,Jan 9 2006, 11:36 AM Wrote:Most people regard their memories as priceless so we can make a fortune!In Pamela Anderson's case, she and her agent may regard her mammaries as priceless: I'd guess she has them insured. Should she be taxed on the "priceless" amount per the dream model (versus the lingerie model), the insured asset amount (her asset is probably insuredet as wellet :P ), or only on the improvements to real property undertaken by various Hollywood surgeons? :blink:
[right][snapback]98973[/snapback][/right]
What is the marginal tax rate (Schedule D-cup) on such enhancements? Is the depreciation based on gravity or elasticity?
I begin to understand how accountants stay busy in the boom and bust world of Hollywood stars. :rolleyes:
Occhi
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete