12-26-2005, 04:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-26-2005, 04:08 PM by Occhidiangela.)
Doc,Dec 23 2005, 09:46 PM Wrote:I uh, use a different view I think. My apologies. On my screen, it's clear to me.For Pete, regarding "fair's fair:" I thought I had pointed my caffeine stained finger at Doc as well
[right][snapback]97963[/snapback][/right]
Quote: In the interest of being taken seriously, ==snip snip==However, in the interest of clarity on the topic of threaded versus unthreaded and "who the heck are you talking to?" issues, I offer the following.
Doc, quite sniggering over there, your posts aren't much more polished.
Occhi
For Doc:
When you don't use the quote function, all it takes to make sure people know to whom you are replying is to open your remarks with the name of the person, or persons, to whom you are replying.
Example: Occhi posts silly nonsense about politics
Doc's reply, threaded view or not: Occhi, you ignorant rogue, and so on.
Example 2: Ghostiger comments on evolution
Doc's reply: Ghostiger, you ignorant feline, and so on
How hard is that? It isn't.
Merry Christmas ;)
Occhi
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete