Ghostiger,Oct 5 2005, 09:02 AM Wrote:You want evidense.Um... If you want to devolve this into a discussion involving my ability to read, or comprehend your complicated post, then we are done. I take it then you were just forum trolling, so I will not take anymore of your bait. Good day.
Look at election returns.
<1% magin of victory.
The fact the recent elections have been so clase all shows that I was riht on the early point that a "key" group can be small. Yes its signifigant(that synonomous with key which it seems you just learned since you mentioned it) but it could easily be a small amount like 5%.
Also the medium we are using here is rather transparent, why dont you actually figure out if someone is generalized before calling them on your "hunch".
I would be embarased to say I used "hunch" when critiquing the substance what some one wrote- it basically means you cant figure out what you read. A "hunch" is more appropriate if you are talking about the persons motives for writing.
[right][snapback]91118[/snapback][/right]
P.S. A dose of reality for your ruminations.