10-05-2005, 02:02 PM
You want evidense.
Look at election returns.
<1% magin of victory.
The fact the recent elections have been so clase all shows that I was riht on the early point that a "key" group can be small. Yes its signifigant(that synonomous with key which it seems you just learned since you mentioned it) but it could easily be a small amount like 5%.
Also the medium we are using here is rather transparent, why dont you actually figure out if someone is generalized before calling them on your "hunch".
I would be embarased to say I used "hunch" when critiquing the substance what some one wrote- it basically means you cant figure out what you read. A "hunch" is more appropriate if you are talking about the persons motives for writing.
Look at election returns.
<1% magin of victory.
The fact the recent elections have been so clase all shows that I was riht on the early point that a "key" group can be small. Yes its signifigant(that synonomous with key which it seems you just learned since you mentioned it) but it could easily be a small amount like 5%.
Also the medium we are using here is rather transparent, why dont you actually figure out if someone is generalized before calling them on your "hunch".
I would be embarased to say I used "hunch" when critiquing the substance what some one wrote- it basically means you cant figure out what you read. A "hunch" is more appropriate if you are talking about the persons motives for writing.