Moonkin = OOMKin
#8
Brista,Oct 2 2005, 06:27 AM Wrote:Very interesting post, some nits though
The dd part gets ALL of the + spellpower damage
Shadowburn (Warlock) but it takes shards
Every 1.0 seconds no? Global cooldown is 1 second
I thought that it didn't. Where did you get this information from? My understanding was that if you were adding 42% of +100 damage then it's 42 regardless of rank or class, just as a +5 scope is +5 on any gun
Yes. Not just that but they can do it while running too.
[right][snapback]90749[/snapback][/right]

Hi, thanks for the nits.

Global cooldown is 1.0 second? Wasn't sure.

I'll mark the 42% vs 100% on the DD portion as debated. We need somebody like Jarulf to do all the numbers work for us (by tracing the machine code), that would be so handy! 42% makes more sense to me. Alas, I do not have enough +dam on my Druid to conduct this experiment. Has someone first-hand experience?

if Moonfire gets 100% +dam on the DD part my reaction is "o.o.o!"

Got many of the numbers from this post (see wiz_ard's reply)
http://vnboards.ign.com/message.asp?topi...&replies=3

Maybe there's a site where the numbers work is all organized for us? Suggestions?

Lower rank spells getting +dam at a lower rate ... another rumor/anecdote fished up by Google. Makes sense though. Well I'm going to get my priest (who has a lot of +spell) to jump off a building and heal with rank 1 Renew, see if it applies. It ought to -- seems to me Blizzard has been very careful about plugging anything remotely exploitable. So far I've found the game "over balanced" if anything.

Yah one of the very few things I've found to be remotely exploitable is the fact that you can put any level enchant on any item of the correct type. +7 Stamina on Ragged Cloth Footwraps for your twinked lvl 3 char, anyone? Oddly, armor kits ARE regulated.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Moonkin = OOMKin - by TheWesson - 09-30-2005, 11:40 PM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by Quark - 10-01-2005, 01:04 AM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by TheWesson - 10-01-2005, 01:42 AM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by savaughn - 10-01-2005, 05:30 AM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by MongoJerry - 10-01-2005, 07:23 PM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by TheWesson - 10-01-2005, 08:47 PM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by Brista - 10-02-2005, 02:27 PM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by TheWesson - 10-02-2005, 05:25 PM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by MongoJerry - 10-02-2005, 05:57 PM
Moonkin = OOMKin - by TheWesson - 10-02-2005, 08:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)