07-10-2005, 11:48 AM
You are not dealing rationally with this.
1 You interjected a completely new psycosis in why she might be dangerous. Nothing suggest that she hears voices or is phsycotic. It appears she was simply willing to do something extremely evil to make her mate happy.(as I said that in no way anuls her guilt.)
2 Perhaps she could be persuaded to do something evil again(by a real person) but i kind of doubt it. At any rate you definetly have n o ground to be "sure" about it.
Violent loners and predator types are far more dangerous types to release. Id rather have hunderds of her type released than 1 child molester who acted alone(even if he never killed anyone).
1 You interjected a completely new psycosis in why she might be dangerous. Nothing suggest that she hears voices or is phsycotic. It appears she was simply willing to do something extremely evil to make her mate happy.(as I said that in no way anuls her guilt.)
2 Perhaps she could be persuaded to do something evil again(by a real person) but i kind of doubt it. At any rate you definetly have n o ground to be "sure" about it.
Violent loners and predator types are far more dangerous types to release. Id rather have hunderds of her type released than 1 child molester who acted alone(even if he never killed anyone).