06-05-2005, 01:25 PM
As I said up front - I utterly disagree with your perspective.
One thing you make a mistake on is that the contrast is not between self and logic. Its between self and the whole(self being a member of the whole). Logic is simply a tool used to compare parts of the whole.
In philosophy I really dont see much reason to agrue with you. You are an existentilalist. I only bother agruing specifics with you.
Argueing with an existentialist is argueing with a meglomaniac who has concisenciously chosen his madness.
One cant prove anythong to to an existentialist because in the end they believe trurth by definition comes from them self and not an out side source.
One thing you make a mistake on is that the contrast is not between self and logic. Its between self and the whole(self being a member of the whole). Logic is simply a tool used to compare parts of the whole.
In philosophy I really dont see much reason to agrue with you. You are an existentilalist. I only bother agruing specifics with you.
Argueing with an existentialist is argueing with a meglomaniac who has concisenciously chosen his madness.
One cant prove anythong to to an existentialist because in the end they believe trurth by definition comes from them self and not an out side source.