05-11-2005, 09:38 PM
Rinnhart,May 11 2005, 04:13 PM Wrote:He can argue rhetoric and dialectics, Quark; he doesn't need a point.
[right][snapback]77010[/snapback][/right]
Actually my first response was completely on the subject. It definetly hadnt "won" or "proved"anything, but it was a reasonable disagreement. He should have either reponded on kind or ignored it.