MMOs:Like em' or not?

[Quark]

By the same note, I could get dishes for my house each month. A year's worth of $12 a month ($144 total) could definately improve my dish collection, especially for oven cooking and silverware, and I'd DEFINATELY use those more than you play your games.

We've all shown pointing the money in other directions is pointless - you can make or take 15 bucks easy by doing that.

Don't bother trying to convince me that paying to play online is worth it. I still play Fallout 2, which is only single player. Last time I picked it up I spent $10. That copy has lasted me 3 years. I can buy games that will last me a long long time and cost very little.

If you enjoy the game, would you pay to keep enjoying it? Fallout 2 might be a great find for you, and I still go back to Planescape: Torment more often than any other game probably, but that doesn't preclude me from enjoying other newer games.

You buy games that cost you a lot to start, and will last no time at all, without a monthly fee.

:angry: Another person is calling me some money waster. The only thing people here know I paid for recently is WoW, but I'm the worst person with money ever according to this board!

've made the investment up front. It's a clear and concise INSULT to ask me to keep paying every month for something that I will play, among all my other games, maybe an hour a month.

Then we're at the point -> If you're only gonna play an hour, don't pay for it. I happen to play a lot, so my investment is quite worth it.

MMORPGs also have too much of the graphics detail being passed over the web. I've never seen an MMO with even close to the graphical detail or quality as your single player/lan/free online games, like UT 2K4, Doom3, HL2, etc.

Oh please, compare in the same genre at least. No genre looks as good as the FPS genre. And yet you're talking about Fallout 2 in the same post. What do you want? Old, cheap, and not highly-graphical, or brand spanking new and shiny?