Are no-name CD-Rs really that crappy?
#7
SpazBear,Mar 14 2005, 04:15 PM Wrote:I've always used name-brand media (3M-Imation), because I'm most concerned with longevity.  Most of my discs are for achival purposes. 

Here's a fear-mongering article that's kept me away from buying Brand X media
LINK
[right][snapback]70658[/snapback][/right]


That article is quite correct, with one caveat - it only really applies to DVD media. There is currently a wide divide between good and bad DVD media. I wouldn't even think of buying Dual-layer, no matter how expensive it is, as it's probably mediocre compared to Single layer DVDRs. The best DVDRs currently are manufactured by Taiyo Yuden. I recently picked up 100 for $AU61.
CDRs on the other hand have a much small delta between good and bad qualities, and even the bad ones are pretty good. I have never had a coaster, even buying the nastiest of the nasty. What I HAVE had happen is the top foil coating peel off on certain cheap brands, so look out for that! Mostly it's only a corner, and the CD is not full, but it does provide an incentive to keep an eye on your CDs. Nowadays I mostly pick up namebrands on good specials.
The biggest issue is the drive. I currently have a Pioneer 108D - one of the nicest DVD writers out there. Previously I had a lite-on CD writer at the peak of their reputation. The Pioneer 109 is now out, if anyone's looking for a drive that can burn anything until HD-DVD comes out.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Are no-name CD-Rs really that crappy? - by DeeBye - 03-13-2005, 03:09 AM
Are no-name CD-Rs really that crappy? - by Wyrm - 03-13-2005, 04:21 AM
Are no-name CD-Rs really that crappy? - by DeeBye - 03-13-2005, 05:20 AM
Are no-name CD-Rs really that crappy? - by Munkay - 03-13-2005, 07:14 AM
Are no-name CD-Rs really that crappy? - by loonygloss - 03-14-2005, 06:54 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)