12-02-2004, 11:23 AM
Xyngynkynyn,Nov 24 2004, 07:21 PM Wrote:The problems in 1-4 are evident because this sample is "quick-and-dirty". ;) I basically applied the same effects with the same settings across all 6 logos so that they could (theoretically) be judged equally but it seems I goofed on that matter. Here's a re-do of that one with the drop shadows closer to the objects.
This oversight on my part does illustrate that 1-4 need greater care when manipulated compared to 5 and 6 but I still believe in my previous stance that the technical aspects of manipulating the design should be secondary to the aesthetics when it comes to choosing one.
[right][snapback]61157[/snapback][/right]
I've got to say, the #6 Black Raised from that group looks the best to me. As stated before: it still gives that "searching eye" idea credit, without being as blunt as the LL's in the middle of an eye itself.
Although...sitting here an idea just struck me: One of the normal eyes that, on a loop, the inner circle spins forming the LL letters inside of an "orb" before slowing into a normal flat disk.
Not sure how that would pan out, but it is just a cuff of the moment idea anyway :-D
"You can build a perfect machine out of imperfect parts."
-Urza
He's an old-fashioned Amish cyborg with no name. She's a virginal nymphomaniac fairy princess married to the Mob. Together, they fight crime!
The Blizzcon Class Discussion:
Crowd: "Our qq's will blot out the sun"
Warlocks: "Then we will pewpew in the shade"
-Urza
He's an old-fashioned Amish cyborg with no name. She's a virginal nymphomaniac fairy princess married to the Mob. Together, they fight crime!
The Blizzcon Class Discussion:
Crowd: "Our qq's will blot out the sun"
Warlocks: "Then we will pewpew in the shade"