11-10-2004, 01:28 PM
Thanks for the answer on the QT four-five thing.
As to casting, I think QT has a lech on for Uma, who wouldn't? ;)
As to the scene in the kitchen, that is typical QT profanity for its own sake, which is part of the reason that my better half is no fan of his. What I want to know is, if the lady of the house is such an über assassin, why did she miss with her first pistol shot out of the cereal box? :P
I remember reading a review some months ago about why Tarantino chose that particular story structure, part of it being tribute to certain styles of film, in the same way that Jackie Brown was a tribute to the Blacksploitation films of the 1970's.
Occhi
As to casting, I think QT has a lech on for Uma, who wouldn't? ;)
As to the scene in the kitchen, that is typical QT profanity for its own sake, which is part of the reason that my better half is no fan of his. What I want to know is, if the lady of the house is such an über assassin, why did she miss with her first pistol shot out of the cereal box? :P
I remember reading a review some months ago about why Tarantino chose that particular story structure, part of it being tribute to certain styles of film, in the same way that Jackie Brown was a tribute to the Blacksploitation films of the 1970's.
Occhi
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete