I'm no longer a big fan of using tables to position graphics. Check out this website; CSS Zen Garden
With the web pages I'm working on, we are pushing all style related information into the (.css) style sheet, including relative or absolute positions of graphical elements. You might want to research the bugs in IE, and work arounds.
Also, your document will act differently in different browsers if you do not declare it's DOM type. Such as;
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" >
<head></head>
<body></body>
</html>
Edit: ... and I second Tal, without the graphics I cannot tell what is broken.
With the web pages I'm working on, we are pushing all style related information into the (.css) style sheet, including relative or absolute positions of graphical elements. You might want to research the bugs in IE, and work arounds.
Also, your document will act differently in different browsers if you do not declare it's DOM type. Such as;
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" >
<head></head>
<body></body>
</html>
Edit: ... and I second Tal, without the graphics I cannot tell what is broken.
”There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." - Hamlet (1.5.167-8), Hamlet to Horatio.
![[Image: yVR5oE.png]](http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/329/yVR5oE.png)
![[Image: VKQ0KLG.png]](http://i.imgur.com/VKQ0KLG.png)