10-31-2004, 11:43 AM
Any1,Oct 29 2004, 08:58 PM Wrote:I thought that WMD did not refer to conventional arms such as high explosives, since any conventional army will have tonnes of this stuff. I always assumed it refered to chemical, biological, and nuclear arms. I'm not trying to discount the story, I'm just trying to get a grip on the terminology.
[right][snapback]58631[/snapback][/right]
True, but the fact is that the pro-war people first started the rumor that all Saddam's WMD's were transported to other countries. What now happened, (the missing radioactive material and high explosives) is indeed something else, and happened during the american occupation.
That Kerry uses this in his campaign...well it is only about that he?. Bush keeps repeating that Kerry would not be a good strong leader. That is also something for which no prove is available (because the only way we will find out is if Kerry wins), and that is one of Bush' strong points...he is very good at selling things that are not true and not proven, and just as with the WMD question also the mud throwing at Kerry works. And of course Kerry does the same.
Yesterday another great Bush interview after the Bin Laden tape.
Bush was saying that terrorists could never influence americans and make them live their live in fear......and that is just what Bush had been trying to do for three years... :blink: scare the american people to be able to perform all his plans to widen the gap between rich and poor.