So, where are(were) those WMDs?

[Zarathustra]

So, in your opinion, The Washington Times is not a reputable enough source? Would you react the same way if the word "Times" would be preceded by the words "New York"?[right][snapback]58574[/snapback][/right]

I think he was questioning The Washington Times' source, not the newspaper itself. I tend to agree that a bit more confirmation would be nice. The newspaper is a secondary source on this matter, thus the primary should rightly be questioned.

And the reputation of a news organization does not denote truth.

(Edit/Addition) Here's a bit more on the story, taken from cnn.com: http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/28/...ives/index.html