I'm looking forward to the next debate. And I sure hope Kerry will not be too sweet with Bush.
In recent days we saw Tony Blair say that Iraq did not have WMDs. Donald Rumsfeld say that there was no evidence whatsoever of a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam (he later took this back via a written statement....please make up your mind). And last, the head of the CIA weapons inspections in Iraq, say that there were no WMDs in Iraq. But (and this is funny) if Saddam would get th chance he would have like to start up his weapons programm again, and might threaten the US.
(Kandrathe you for sure have some link which says I took things out of context :D
(friendly joke))
So let's make things clear now. Democrats and republicans alike as well as europeans are happy that Saddam is gone, no doubt about that. So is it likely that Bush starts using that argument in the next debate?? And will he finally apologize, for all the lies. I mean this is Watergate to the power 10.
In recent days we saw Tony Blair say that Iraq did not have WMDs. Donald Rumsfeld say that there was no evidence whatsoever of a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam (he later took this back via a written statement....please make up your mind). And last, the head of the CIA weapons inspections in Iraq, say that there were no WMDs in Iraq. But (and this is funny) if Saddam would get th chance he would have like to start up his weapons programm again, and might threaten the US.
(Kandrathe you for sure have some link which says I took things out of context :D
(friendly joke))
So let's make things clear now. Democrats and republicans alike as well as europeans are happy that Saddam is gone, no doubt about that. So is it likely that Bush starts using that argument in the next debate?? And will he finally apologize, for all the lies. I mean this is Watergate to the power 10.