Question on presidential debates

[eppie]

I think we've been referencing the movie Fight Club in which Brad Pitt explains the rules of the group as
"Rule #1: You do not talk about Fight Club; Rule #2: You DO NOT TALK about Fight Club;" etc.

Ah, thanks, I knew I should have seen that movie. :unsure:

but another little tidbit:
Is it realy true that the candidates are spending approximately $ 200 Million each on their campaign?
(if so, I am wondering why no candidate came up with the idea of reducing the campaign cost and instead giving a large chunk of the money to 9/11 victims and/or Iraq Vets?)

Yes they do spend all this money, and this is one of the most important things that are wrong with this way of elections/democracy.
Most of the big companies contribute to the campaign, and they ussually contribute to both parties. (so that whoever wins, you gave him money). Needless to say companies would very much appreciate to get something back for these contributions.
Because without TV commercials you don't stand a chance of becoming elected, you need this money. (people like TC commercials more than presedential debates)
To my opinion (which does not matter at all (e occhi ;) ) they should change that. Every party should get broadcasting time on TV (without paying for that), both parties would get the same amount of time of course.

Just like the criticism on Bush (many people say he invaded Iraq for his own profits) if it is true or not, you should not let there be any chance that people might think that companies who contribute to the campaigns of candidates get things back for that. There is too much chance that candidates look like they are corrupt. So I would favor a law which makes it impossible for companies to contribute to campaign funds.