09-10-2004, 09:50 PM
I do agree that you may hold the "bad" does not exist, but then I said that. I say bad in the sense of being "wrong" - pervasively utterly wrong.
Also I dont say he must be bad/wrong but rather if you accept the notion that anyone can be bad, then his position means he must fit the catagory.
The existentialist position itself is inherently bad/wrong relative to all else that exists(it wouldnt be wrong to existentialist, but of course the point is moot to the existentialist.) This is demonstrable and obvious.
Also I dont say he must be bad/wrong but rather if you accept the notion that anyone can be bad, then his position means he must fit the catagory.
The existentialist position itself is inherently bad/wrong relative to all else that exists(it wouldnt be wrong to existentialist, but of course the point is moot to the existentialist.) This is demonstrable and obvious.