03-31-2003, 03:58 PM
What an incredible example of muddy thinking!
Brave or not, you certainly don't know much.
Anyone can hold any useless opinion they wish. But if you want to voice it, you had better expect to have to defend it - with facts. Conner made a sweeping generalization and was rightly called on it.
The 'facts' you pulled out to support Conner's contention were utter hogwash. A sample size of two is not anything to draw conclusions from.
Archon made a very polite post with some valuable advice in it. Pete offered up a website that gives guidance in logical thinking. Since you chose not to avail yourself of either, I have no qualms about offering my opinion that your opinions are not worth reading. I think the facts that support my opinion are already on this board.
Brave or not, you certainly don't know much.
Anyone can hold any useless opinion they wish. But if you want to voice it, you had better expect to have to defend it - with facts. Conner made a sweeping generalization and was rightly called on it.
The 'facts' you pulled out to support Conner's contention were utter hogwash. A sample size of two is not anything to draw conclusions from.
Archon made a very polite post with some valuable advice in it. Pete offered up a website that gives guidance in logical thinking. Since you chose not to avail yourself of either, I have no qualms about offering my opinion that your opinions are not worth reading. I think the facts that support my opinion are already on this board.
And you may call it righteousness
When civility survives,
But I've had dinner with the Devil and
I know nice from right.
From Dinner with the Devil, by Big Rude Jake
When civility survives,
But I've had dinner with the Devil and
I know nice from right.
From Dinner with the Devil, by Big Rude Jake