I've provided the educational basis for my reasoning on the good this can cause. I don't pretend that the means going in are controversal and I don't like ends justify the means arguments any more than anybody else. Bush could probably done a whole lot better job trying to sell it and at least reduce the rancor it caused on both ends. And if you believe Bush distorted or lied about reasoning going in, fine, I understand
But that's not the point. To provide justification for your pre-war assumptions, you're trying to talk down post-war results without offering anything other than emotion for your support because of your partisanship towards Bush. I could give a crap about Bush myself, I have plenty of issues I don't like him over. What I want is to find solutions to terrorism and analyze what have been the results, whether good or bad, of what's happened so far. If a guy with a D by his name is the one that will work to end it, great. I'm frantically waiting for them to recognize that it's an issue and talk about it.
Sir, don't lecture me about education or history and partisanship when you don't bring up even the slightest historical backing for your rebuttle and fall back into talking about Bush is a liar in a thread where I've discussed his name one time in this subthread and only then to say I agreed with his policy independant of and before Bush declared it.
I want results, not carping and belittling about the results because of people that don't like whoever is the president at the time. I felt the same way under Clinton. So don't lecture me on partisanship. I find the whole political dance obscene. Do you have anything to add other than bile?
But that's not the point. To provide justification for your pre-war assumptions, you're trying to talk down post-war results without offering anything other than emotion for your support because of your partisanship towards Bush. I could give a crap about Bush myself, I have plenty of issues I don't like him over. What I want is to find solutions to terrorism and analyze what have been the results, whether good or bad, of what's happened so far. If a guy with a D by his name is the one that will work to end it, great. I'm frantically waiting for them to recognize that it's an issue and talk about it.
Sir, don't lecture me about education or history and partisanship when you don't bring up even the slightest historical backing for your rebuttle and fall back into talking about Bush is a liar in a thread where I've discussed his name one time in this subthread and only then to say I agreed with his policy independant of and before Bush declared it.
I want results, not carping and belittling about the results because of people that don't like whoever is the president at the time. I felt the same way under Clinton. So don't lecture me on partisanship. I find the whole political dance obscene. Do you have anything to add other than bile?