01-19-2004, 03:27 AM
Youre frabricating a stance for me. Not unexspected from you though.
You tend to always call names that have nothing to do with their comments when they show a flaw in your grand perception.
You know a huge amount of facts, but I dont think your terribly good at putting them together.
I never said we need to use no energy, I said less. And I didnt even venture to make value judgments on what are reasonable uses.
The here are some obvious ways to use less energy that would have the least impact on our quality of live that I can think of. But of course they are just my opinions
-smaller fuel effiecent cars.
-use rail for more transportation and perhaps freight(would require large changes in out infrastructure to do the frieght again)
-less and smarter airconditioning
-mandate effiecent light bulbs
None of that would signifigantly lower anyones quality of life. It would make some businesses less profitable intially, but in the long run an economy adapts to systemic changes.
You tend to always call names that have nothing to do with their comments when they show a flaw in your grand perception.
You know a huge amount of facts, but I dont think your terribly good at putting them together.
I never said we need to use no energy, I said less. And I didnt even venture to make value judgments on what are reasonable uses.
The here are some obvious ways to use less energy that would have the least impact on our quality of live that I can think of. But of course they are just my opinions
-smaller fuel effiecent cars.
-use rail for more transportation and perhaps freight(would require large changes in out infrastructure to do the frieght again)
-less and smarter airconditioning
-mandate effiecent light bulbs
None of that would signifigantly lower anyones quality of life. It would make some businesses less profitable intially, but in the long run an economy adapts to systemic changes.