The No Win Situation

[Archon_Wing]

Then why is that openly homosexual donkey-party legislator okay in formulating a bill designed to extend HIS views on homosexual behavior into the lives of every sentient being living within the confines of the nation's most populous state?

Umm, last time I heard he was not forcing anyone to be gay. Obviously his more extremnist actions like depiction of graphic gay sexual activity was ridiclous not due to homosexuality being wrong but due to common sense.

There's a diffrence between standing up for your beliefs and pushing them on other people. While his former actions indeed make him an extremenist, we are discussing this issue.

Meaning: what kind of nation do we choose to be? What ideas and principles do the majority of us espouse, embrace, and defend?

That's a great question. But I dare you to speak for the entirty of America.

You name me what sort of benefit humanity derives from homosexual behavior, and maybe I'll defend it. I see only negativity associated with and from that behavior, period. ONLY negativity.

There are a lot of things were society does not benifit from. But how would this harm anyone? Homoesexuals cannot have children. How is this a threat to society?

California skewls in particular STRIONGLY OVERWHELMINGLY present in their various K-12 social studies-health class textbooks the specious notion that homosexual behavior is morally equivalent to male-female relations in every way imaginable. They browbeat and intimidate students into being ashamed of even THINKING of daring to express any criticism of homosexual behavior. 

How odd, I haven't seen a textbook telling me to embrace homosexuality. Maybe I'm not in the right school.

You're thinking WAY too narrowly, then. I clearly stated that it is a historical fact that when human socities decline to such a point that they can no longer say 'no" to any of of the silly, nonsensical, unhealthy, and above all UNWORTHY whims which are ALWAYS being promulgated by various small groups of out-of-the-mainstream people, then wholesale societal collapse inevitably follows.

And I could say you are thinking too broadly. Something along the lines of a slippery slope.
Oh yeah, why is "tolerance" considered by you as conforming to your beliefs? Perhaps you and I have a diffrent definition for that word