07-26-2003, 09:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-26-2003, 09:33 PM by Rhydderch Hael.)
The fault lays not in any lack of information on our part. The fault lays in your misrepresented slant of the thread topic. From the words you employed here, you presented this discussion as a transvestite affirmative action bill, not an anti-discrimination bill!
Feryar's response about quotas appeared to me to have been a remark led by your mistaken slant, as if a business had to hire a travestite despite any or all other considered factors, as if to fill an AA quota.
If there arose any confusion for us perceiving the bill (and this thread) between affirmative action or anti-discrimination, mayhaps you should better exercise the skills of debate that allow you to convey the issue clearly and truthfully from the start, without needing these clarifying responses!
As I said, AA got nicked here in California. From the AA slant of your post, this fell false upon my ears.
Quote:They are trying to make a law, where business must hire transvestites or face a 150,000 dollar fine. So, hire a cross dresser or else.Does that sound like you're presenting a case that pertains to anti-discrimination or affirmative action?
Feryar's response about quotas appeared to me to have been a remark led by your mistaken slant, as if a business had to hire a travestite despite any or all other considered factors, as if to fill an AA quota.
If there arose any confusion for us perceiving the bill (and this thread) between affirmative action or anti-discrimination, mayhaps you should better exercise the skills of debate that allow you to convey the issue clearly and truthfully from the start, without needing these clarifying responses!
As I said, AA got nicked here in California. From the AA slant of your post, this fell false upon my ears.
Political Correctness is the idea that you can foster tolerance in a diverse world through the intolerance of anything that strays from a clinical standard.