I recommend you Dragon´s Crown

[Hammerskjold]

It's called Feminine Charms, sir. It exists in 3d as well. And I'm saying this as someone who doesn't like badly done bikini armor, or overly gratuitous fanservice.

How you can write that sentence, and defend that depiction at the same time is simply a mystery to me. No woman can actually make that pose, and anyone who tried wouldn't look charming and feminine, they'd look like a contortionist. That's only "feminine charms" if that means "displaying as much boobs and butt at the same time as possible." If this passes the test for overly gratuitous fanservice, what is it that fails?

This is to say nothing of the *jiggle physics*.

-Jester

I will defend the hyper exaggeration -2d- depiction, in a hyper exaggerated 2d world.

In -our- 3d universe, I can't defend a straight up conversion from 2d to our 3d realm, not just out of 'morality' but because of actual physical barriers.

If you were to port the fighter as is proportion wise, unconverted to our 3d space, he might have to be treated for polio.

But if it's such a mystery to you, I'll try to clear the air. 2d hyper exaggeration in a hyper exaggerated 2d world, where loin cloth and bikini armor is treated as normal, I really don't see a huge moral outrage. Or maybe, just not necessarily to the same degree as you. I do want to see how well done it is, out of my own personal interest.

3D has it's own rules for exaggeration, and I never confused the two. If there is a 'port', I never claimed it would be a straight as is with nothing changed.

It's a mystery to me, why you would think I'd treat 2d=3d. I said the thing exists in both realms. I never said they were identical.

Puhleze, a lil credit here.

edited for hopefully clearer meaning.