06-09-2013, 06:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2013, 06:19 AM by FireIceTalon.)
(06-09-2013, 05:23 AM)eppie Wrote: Sorry, i didn't really write down what point i was trying to make. My issue whit nitefox' comment ( which is one your hear a lot from religious people nowadays as well) is that by calling people atheists you suggest some kind of group structure such as you have with religions.......but this group structure is not existing. Being an atheist just means you know that gods of all kind don't exist, it doesn't mean you are part of some group.
Ah, ok I understand now. And I agree.
Never understood the whole notion that "atheism is a religion" or why some people call it such - it just shows peoples definitions of things, is well, anything. People will swear cherries and chocolate candies are the same thing these days, just because both have a sweet taste.
https://www.youtube.com/user/FireIceTalon
"Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class, made into law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economic conditions of the existence of your class." - Marx (addressing the bourgeois)
"Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class, made into law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economic conditions of the existence of your class." - Marx (addressing the bourgeois)