(04-23-2013, 05:05 PM)FireIceTalon Wrote: I think these distinctions are important because many people view "radicals" as simply being anyone who has a extreme political view of how society should be, but that isn't always the case since it doesn't take context into account. It really depends on which direction you want to goIs it direction, or the lengths that you are willing to go in that direction? Once you take anarchism as far as the Galleanists, or the weather underground against the vietnam war, or politcal Islam as far as the Tsarnaevs, then you've crossed the line where the Government will oppose you "for the common good".
i.e. What path are you taking that hasn't been tred by those who've gone before?
Maybe you just need the right radical to take you to where they've already been?