09-29-2012, 04:07 AM
(09-29-2012, 03:19 AM)Alram Wrote:(09-28-2012, 11:41 PM)FireIceTalon Wrote:I have no real interest in pursuing this issue further. It just came as a surprise to me that you were in favor of personal property rights.(09-28-2012, 10:12 PM)Alram Wrote:(09-28-2012, 04:27 PM)FireIceTalon Wrote: Private property for Marx = class relationships on control to the means of production, as opposed to what we think of today (personal property).
So when Marx wrote "Abolition of property in land" he didn't really mean abolishing land ownership?
The communist manifesto also promotes "Abolition of all rights of inheritance." How do the neo-Marxists get around that one? If individuals can't inherit, their land and property goes to the state.
Comrade Alram, let us not derail this thread from the original topic.
However, I will be more than happy to continue this discussion with you privately, or if you wish to make another thread. Cheers.
very well.
https://www.youtube.com/user/FireIceTalon
"Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class, made into law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economic conditions of the existence of your class." - Marx (on capitalist laws and institutions)
"Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class, made into law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economic conditions of the existence of your class." - Marx (on capitalist laws and institutions)