Department of Agriculture

[Hammerskjold]

My concern was more that people factor in the costs (in burnt oil) in smelting the tower, turbine, etc. then transporting to the prairie.

Yeah...if this was any other industry, they'd be called 'jobs'. Even if subsidies was\is involved. Even if there are jobs \ positions created simply to make some employment. Even if it wasn't 100% 'efficient', it's still better than getting politically ousted because the voters don't have jobs.

So why the sudden concern with counting dollars to the pennies when it comes to solar and wind?

What doesn't make sense is ongoing funding for operations, for either solar or wind generation (or coal, oil or natural gas either).

And yet ongoing funding still does flow into coil, oil, and natural gas. Many times I hear the justification is to support the jobs\economy. Both directly, and indirectly such as other industries that relies on worker\that industry dollars. After all employed people who has some spending money, spends that money. On things, services, maybe some nice shoes etc. All that magical invisible hand of the marketplace jazz libtards all seems to love.

So again, why the sudden penny pinching when it comes to solar, wind, or any other alternative source of energy technology? Do solar\wind engineers\maintenance\installers crew people just hoard their monies, and buy nothing? Or do they just bury it for composting or something? Maybe they're really bad tippers at restaurant? If they even go to restaurants...