06-17-2012, 12:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-17-2012, 12:33 AM by Concillian.)
(06-16-2012, 11:49 PM)Treesh Wrote: Lissa, just accept the fact that what YOU think of as QA is NOT the industry standard for QA.
You've been around long enough to know Lissa isn't going to do this.
Before I posted this:
Quote:I agree, game balance and such are developer issues, and not QA issues.
At least according to my conversations with my friends who work (well worked) in game QA.
I had put another sentence that was something to the extent of... not that that matters since you'll argue that the game industries definition of QA is wrong....
I deleted it before I posted, but he is pretty predictable.
Lissa will be Lissa, Treesh. If he hasn't changed by now, he's not about to start. Just let it slide. I mean he's already been arguing with at least 2 or three people who agree with him in in the areas that matter, but disagree primarily in the semantics of the definition of QA... he's drawn in you and TD into the fray because of the definition of a word... just let him live in his world, the thread will die, and we'll all be happier for it.
Conc / Concillian -- Vintage player of many games. Deadly leader of the All Pally Team (or was it Death leader?)
Terenas WoW player... while we waited for Diablo III.
And it came... and it went... and I played Hearthstone longer than Diablo III.
Terenas WoW player... while we waited for Diablo III.
And it came... and it went... and I played Hearthstone longer than Diablo III.