04-26-2012, 12:48 AM
(04-25-2012, 07:35 PM)Mavfin Wrote:(04-25-2012, 07:28 PM)kandrathe Wrote: I figured they didn't quite expect the impact from the volume of testers and tried to re-tool during the emergency maintenance.
Isn't that why they do stress tests? To find out if things are going to crash?
(04-22-2012, 03:48 PM)NuurAbSaal Wrote: My 2.8GHz iMac is groaning under the load of the lowest settings as well. Still, just hearing the music during the first few seconds was already worth the download \
take care
Tarabulus
Definitely some graphic optimization needed on the Mac side. However, my three-year-old 2.67 GHz i7 with an ATI GPU just plows through on high settings, 60 FPS. The newer (1 year) 3.0 GHz i3 iMac with ATI mobile-type GPU has issues above medium, and just stops when someone tosses unruned corpse spiders till the animation finishes. Runed spiders are fine, though, and frogs don't bother a bit.
I'm hoping the finished game will run a bit better. I can't afford to buy a new machine just for gaming, I shouldn't even have bought the game . Bit disappointing that even the 3GHz iMac is struggling.
Well, I used to main tank MC and BWL with <10fps, I guess I can deal with 15-20fps Diablo III. ALso, if memory serves, there are usually Mac-specific patches coming out not too far behind release that address performance.
take care
Tarabulus
"I'm a cynical optimistic realist. I have hopes. I suspect they are all in vain. I find a lot of humor in that." -Pete
I'll remember you.
I'll remember you.