05-18-2011, 04:04 AM
(05-17-2011, 07:37 AM)kandrathe Wrote: God refuses to weigh in on the debate in a decisive manner. My arguments stem from law alone. It's hard enough to attempt a rational discussion of one topic without clouding it up with various theologies as well.
Your arguments aside, the vast majority of anti-abortionists absolutely cite God. To deny that is foolish.
(05-17-2011, 07:37 AM)kandrathe Wrote: The issue is one of vagueness in defining when a human begins to exist, and by what criteria we differentiate between a lump of dividing cells and a human being.
I absolutely agree with this.
(05-17-2011, 07:37 AM)kandrathe Wrote: But, to boil down the two sides in a less politically correct manner, they are "keep the fetus to term", and "kill the fetus". Then we can simply argue about whether and when a human fetus is really a living human being. If you want to base it on the same basis (brain activity) as those of us outside the womb, the fetus develops a functioning brain between the 7th and 10th week.
I certainly won't pretend to be an expert on baby development, but I really have a hard time grasping that a fetus weighing a few grams is in any way a "living human being". Yes, it may have brain activity but it certainly isn't viable outside of the womb (much like my brother in law). I could make the analogy that a 7-10 week fetus is more of a parasite, but that just leads me back to my brother in law joke.
(05-17-2011, 07:37 AM)kandrathe Wrote: Here is some research from Pew, showing how the opinion trends are shifting
Popular opinion trends mean nothing in a discussion like this.