Hi,
Since I'm trying to be green and not waste electrons, I've mostly stayed out of this thread. Besides, I've stated my position in the past and it hasn't changed recently, so I had nothing to add. But there is a small point I must address.
Yes, it was. And because of the way it was done, with a no-strings-attached attitude, it went a lot further towards saving the bankers than it did the banks. I didn't notice much of an increase in money flow after the bail out, but maybe I should have been looking to the Bahamas and private accounts.
--Pete
Since I'm trying to be green and not waste electrons, I've mostly stayed out of this thread. Besides, I've stated my position in the past and it hasn't changed recently, so I had nothing to add. But there is a small point I must address.
(09-29-2010, 07:02 PM)Jester Wrote: Saving the banks was a necessary first step, . . .
Yes, it was. And because of the way it was done, with a no-strings-attached attitude, it went a lot further towards saving the bankers than it did the banks. I didn't notice much of an increase in money flow after the bail out, but maybe I should have been looking to the Bahamas and private accounts.
--Pete
How big was the aquarium in Noah's ark?