Quote:Consider this, Batman is the only non-superpowered member of the Justice League, that says something right there. Also, Batman has devised a contingency for any and all JL members that could go rogue and how to deal with them, permanently if need be.But... if the argument is that Superman would lose against Batman because he's just such an old softie that he'd lose to someone several orders of magnitude less powerful (who is also a badass), then why would "rogue" Superman subscribe to the same crippling moral code? Wouldn't he be the kind of jerk who vaporizes people from a mile away using heat vision and light speed? Wouldn't he be the guy who hurls an asteroid at Batman at near-light speeds, regardless of the collateral damage? Or is rogue Superman the worst of both worlds - amoral enough to betray the JLA, but still a total chump who won't take one of the thousand obvious Batman-annihilating tactics available to him?
There has even been a quote in the DC universe attributed to Superman saying something to the effect that Batman is the most dangerous individual on Earth. Superman has even gone so far as to give Batman some Kryptonite to deal with him if he goes rogue.
I mean, having a plan is great and all, but if I recall correctly, Germany had a plan to win WWI. A good plan is an advantage, but it certainly isn't an automatic win against a vastly more powerful opponent - even if you are Batman.
-Jester