03-04-2009, 12:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-04-2009, 12:52 AM by Occhidiangela.)
Quote:Did it occur to you that I was talking about the majority of *representatives*, or even *voters*, not the majority of the *population*? Or are you just so very eager to find something to nitpick so you can pick yet another fight with me?So you fall in to the trap, all so easily.
('round and 'round we go... I ask you to stop insulting me, you keep insulting me... whee!)
-Jester
Among that thirty percent, or so, or evern forty percent whose boy is elected,
Be the boy Clinton, Reagan, W Bush, Obama, FDR, or whomever, to include Prodi et al in Europe, the ones who actually set the agenda
Your words, my friend
are a small set of active and committed people.
The rest are along for the ride.
Once again, the core truth of politics is that a minority sets the political agenda. Lenin, for example, was no idiot. He understood very well what political action required: a core group of people who'd have the gumption to bloody well pursue their aims, and either recruit or cast aside opposition.
It's how it works, and has for a long time.
What the hard working agenda setters need is a sales pitch that works well enough. They then sell their platform.
This even works within smaller groups, to include parties in office in halls of government.
Group dynamics, 101.
Jester, before you get all upset about being picked on, read the words you write through a lens other than your own belief in yourself.
Occhi
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete