04-27-2008, 04:56 PM
THANK you, Quark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
THANK you, Quark, I agree with you. I was finally getting back to this thread and you have already stated my view. I don't have much free time and I spend much time agonizing over the wording of any "issue" post I write. (I have 12 days left of my one remaining class, yay! but busy busy)
Watch out, in that other thread, having such an unscientific opinion will get you labeled as "emotional"!
-V
Quote:I'm a proponent for nuclear power, but I'd argue the only thing we should consider "safe enough" for new power are those that are passively safe - in the event on an accident or problem the reaction naturally slows down rather than speeding up, without any intervention. As far as I'm seeing, there's not a single passively safe reactor in the US that's yet active.
THANK you, Quark, I agree with you. I was finally getting back to this thread and you have already stated my view. I don't have much free time and I spend much time agonizing over the wording of any "issue" post I write. (I have 12 days left of my one remaining class, yay! but busy busy)
Watch out, in that other thread, having such an unscientific opinion will get you labeled as "emotional"!
-V