Is Obama hurting the Democratic Party by not joining forces with Hilla

[Occhidiangela]

Happy? Are you happy? You sure don't seem it.

That would be correct.

What does that gnomic little statement mean?

Willful obtuse much? Is it what amuses you?

That things you are familiar with are untrue? That things you are not contemptuous of are true? I can't parse anything out of it that isn't an obvious fallacy or a meaningless statement. Care to elaborate?

That which you have a great amount of detail about you can examine in sufficient depth to hold in contempt, as it is low hanging fruit, and you need not do any work to get to where you can hold yourself aloft in some self congratulatory status of above x, y, or z. It's the game you continue playing. (I am beginning to think that you style yourself some sort of Skeptic, with a capital S.)

That which is more difficult to obtain info about you do not bother to examine in depth.

Hence the reference to Tibet, in contrast to the rut of America bashing (and specifically the trivially simple exercise of Bush bashing, one of the world's easiest targets ever) you have been in for some years.

Fallacy?

More pendantic tripe from our alleged philosopher, this self proclaimed seeker for truth. Go back into the cave and talk to the shadows, you'll be better off.

If, on the other hand, you are fool enough to attempt to find truth in politics, even the cave cannot help you.

You'd do just as well look up, into my nostrils, to find truth.

Occhi