"It´s just a question of logics."
No, it isn't.
And my point stands. "Sense" is not a substitute for "evidence". You can't convict a criminal in a court of law on the basis that their having done it makes sense.
If it were a question of logic, you'd be right, there would be no need to (further) demonstrate the truth. But it isn't.
Jester
No, it isn't.
And my point stands. "Sense" is not a substitute for "evidence". You can't convict a criminal in a court of law on the basis that their having done it makes sense.
If it were a question of logic, you'd be right, there would be no need to (further) demonstrate the truth. But it isn't.
Jester