Quote:You have still not demonstrated that this is actually what is going on here. Even if so, there is another way to look at the question: Should the state always refrain from removing children from threatening situations simply on the basis that the situation is caused by their parents' political stance? Do parents have unlimited rights to make their children into political symbols, even if that is endangering them?There was that whole 60's thing with kids named Peace, Love, Freedom, etc. Then you just have people naming their children with wacky names, like Moon Unit Zappa, or Pilot Inspektor Lee? How about those Rodriguez boys Rebel, Rocket, Racer and Rogue? What about the child named Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116?
-Jester
And, yes, unfortunately for societies control freaks, parents have still pretty much have unlimited rights. As far as I know the rules for children are 1) no abuse (which is what CPS must be inferring), and 2) must go to school.
Hitler’s Mom Speaks Out, Defies Court Order Or, in other words, the state takes away your children without giving you a reason, orders you to remain silent on the case, and then stalls on the hearings until they can find some legal case against you. Sounds like the tactics of a totalitarian state to me.
Also, isn't this backwards? Shouldn't the state's responsibility be to protect the Campbell's from this seemingly fictitious angry anti-Nazi mob? Has any violence been witnessed, other than the actions of the state? There have been some angry anonymous letters, but that hardly can be construed to be a threat to the Campbell's safety. If they are a threat, then the states responsibility is to investigate the writers of the letters.