Data on galncing mechanic change
#3
Quote:What are you using to list % of hits? If it's across all hits, there's a statistical error (70% Moroes, 75% BBW, 75% Curator, 76% Maiden instead of 100%). If it's across all attacks, well, I've never heard of a boss that has 25%-30% avoidance.

Well the composition is changing some on these bosses too. BBW the druid had a lot more hits and in DPS gear, not subject to DW penalty. Curator had one of the DW warriors not on him most of the evocate because he was on the last flare, Maiden lost both DW warriors, 1 to attrition, 1 due to early death. The trends seem to follow expectation as the number of DW hits subject to miss penalty change. There is some expected variation here. Being a tabular system, this shouldn't matter, nor should tank data having extra parries and such. Glancings are still going to be a fixed %.

Our WWS data is here:
http://www.lossendil.com/wws/?report=sahju6sjxrb3c

and yes, I changed the config to list "pure" hits not hits + crits.
Conc / Concillian -- Vintage player of many games. Deadly leader of the All Pally Team (or was it Death leader?)
Terenas WoW player... while we waited for Diablo III.
And it came... and it went... and I played Hearthstone longer than Diablo III.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Data on galncing mechanic change - by Concillian - 05-25-2007, 09:25 PM
Data on galncing mechanic change - by Quark - 05-26-2007, 02:58 AM
Data on galncing mechanic change - by Concillian - 05-26-2007, 03:11 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)