05-08-2007, 06:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2007, 06:22 PM by Occhidiangela.)
Quote:Oh, yeah, that's really scary right there. Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Sarkozy is loathed by a large segment of the population. No, it must be "socialists" mobilizing their "clients."I see.
Practically communism already.
-Jester
You are now playing the apologist for a form of governance wherein if you don't win an election, you have the right to riot. I was under the impression that the ideal to be achieved was to hold the elections, and if the other party wins this one, you redouble your own efforts, if on the losing side, to win the next one. I note that the nation where you live works under that rubric.
How odd, that you now seem to prefer the threat of violence as a trump to an election.
Anarchy much?
No, not communism. Anarchy as a prelude to a replay of the Terror? Not sure, but the real estate is the same.
Royal was running on a socialist ticket. Her NOT winning was root cause of the riots, so the riots are rooted in her support in a segment of the population. Since I am not convinced that the garden variety French Socialist was a rioter, I presume it was a client: a subest of the electorate who the socialists pandered to in an effort to gain votes.
The suspiscion that something more nefarious is at work I won't comment on without further info.
Occhi
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete