12-18-2006, 07:12 PM
Quote:It's entirely possible Naxxramas was balanced with the thought that 60s SHOULD need all those consumeables, but 70s would not.
Kind of a built-in longevity factor, perhaps?
Not if Blizzard keeps the boss mechanics as they are right now. It means that all pre-tBC raid instances will not be worth it as bosses will scale to always be 3 levels higher than the people in the raid. Imagine Rags being 73 and hitting like a level 73 raid boss. Is it really worth the time to go fight him then?
Unless Blizzard caps Boss levels for each of the pre-tBC raids, they will be never touched by the level 70 crowd, even the casuals. The time and effort will not be worth it in anyway. The only way I can see Blizzard making these instances still viable to be run in the 70 level range is if they set the bosses to still scale to +3 except that there is a maximum level bosses can be in each instance (my thought is maximum top boss for MC and Z'G would be 63, BWL and AQ20 65, AQ40 67, and Naxx at 69 with some bosses being lower below these caps in each instance). If Blizzard does as I suggest above, we'll see people still hitting the pre-tBC instances, if not, they'll be ghost towns never used again by the raiding populace.
Sith Warriors - They only class that gets a new room added to their ship after leaving Hoth, they get a Brooncloset
Einstein said Everything is Relative.
Heisenberg said Everything is Uncertain.
Therefore, everything is relatively uncertain.
Einstein said Everything is Relative.
Heisenberg said Everything is Uncertain.
Therefore, everything is relatively uncertain.