10-09-2006, 08:33 PM
That's a subtly different matter.
It's one thing to say "we can't make an encounter with a certain type of decursing challenge, because it'll be blown away by decursive." This means that Blizzard is limited in their ability to design encounters.
It's another to say "aha, well, players can beat this encounter even though it contains retardedly difficult decursing, since they all have decursive." This means that all players either need decursive, or need to abandon all hope of progressing.
Is there an encounter that can't be beaten without decursive? I've not yet been to AQ40 or Naxx, so I'm not sure (and am a mere warrior anyway). From my limited experience, I think Blizzard is thinking the first, not the second.
-Jester
It's one thing to say "we can't make an encounter with a certain type of decursing challenge, because it'll be blown away by decursive." This means that Blizzard is limited in their ability to design encounters.
It's another to say "aha, well, players can beat this encounter even though it contains retardedly difficult decursing, since they all have decursive." This means that all players either need decursive, or need to abandon all hope of progressing.
Is there an encounter that can't be beaten without decursive? I've not yet been to AQ40 or Naxx, so I'm not sure (and am a mere warrior anyway). From my limited experience, I think Blizzard is thinking the first, not the second.
-Jester